By Plenary Sessions: Raimond Kaljulaid

The style is explanatory, factual, and emphasizes the seriousness of the problem and the urgency of the solution, referencing repeated incidents and community fear. The speaker utilizes extensive statistical data and logical arguments to justify the necessity of the bill and answer detailed questions. The tone is generally constructive and seeks cross-party support.

The rhetorical style is predominantly combative, critical, and direct, especially when directed at the Foreign Minister and the major Western powers. The speaker balances historical and logical arguments (the keys to success in the 1990s) with powerful emotional attacks, labeling the Foreign Minister's actions as "petty" and "profoundly inappropriate." He employs strong metaphors ("sycophants," "pennant," and "tie pin") and poses rhetorical questions.