By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The rhetorical style is analytical and inquisitive, focusing on determining specific figures and orders of magnitude. The tone is formal and neutral, aimed at clarifying technical details and obtaining fact-based information from the presenter.

The speaker’s rhetorical style is formal, logical, and data-driven, focusing on detailed explanations and preempting counterarguments, particularly concerning costs and safety. The tone is optimistic about the technology’s potential and stresses the urgency of making a decision to establish a legal framework. Simplifying analogies (such as the chicken and the egg, or marriage) are employed to clarify complex procedural and ownership issues.

The style is highly professional, analytical, and solution-oriented, highlighting the logical links between the economy, education, and international cooperation. The tone is generally positive and constructive, even while acknowledging the dramatic changes and problems that have occurred in the economy. The speaker supports their arguments using data and specific examples (e.g., studies on the benefits of CERN procurements) and takes additional time to facilitate a meaningful discussion.

The style is formal, procedural, and highly detailed, characteristic of a commission representative reporting on the progress of the proceedings. The tone is analytical and neutral when conveying the positions of stakeholders, but becomes firm when addressing obstruction. The arguments are primarily logical, citing legal provisions and the commission's consensus decisions.

The rhetorical style is analytical, confident, and at times confrontational, especially when questioning the motives of opponents. The appeals are primarily logical and technical, explaining the system's simplicity and contrasting the security of the e-vote with the easy falsifiability of the paper vote (for instance, using the example of a pen with disappearing ink). He/She criticizes the imbalance of the debate and calls it a political ball game.

The rhetorical style is formal, informative, and procedural, serving as a neutral transmitter of the Economic Committee's deliberations. The tone is analytical and logical, focusing on a fact-based overview of the bill's contentious issues and the course of proceedings. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on conveying details and explanations.

The rhetorical style is fact-based, analytical, and defensive, focusing on refuting rumors and hypotheses with concrete facts. Logical appeals and technical explanations are used, maintaining a formal and authoritative tone. To emphasize system security, the verifiability of the electoral system is compared to the technology implemented in banking.