By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The political position strongly supports initiating the creation of a legal framework for nuclear energy, emphasizing that this is crucial for achieving climate neutrality, energy security, and a competitive economy. The position is clearly policy- and fact-based, focusing on clarifying the chain of decisions and refuting misinformation. The speaker stresses that the decision concerns the creation of the framework, not the construction of the plant itself.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The political position involves strong support for the ratification of CERN full membership, emphasizing its significance for Estonian business and technological development. This is a policy-driven stance focused on finalizing a long-term process that was initiated more than ten years ago. The objective is to realize Estonia's opportunities before CERN's 70th anniversary.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position is centered on advancing Draft Law 400, which amends the Traffic Insurance Act, while supporting the proposals put forth by the lead committee. The approach is strongly procedural and policy-driven, emphasizing the correctness and adherence to the timeline of the bill's proceedings. The objective is to ensure the adoption of the draft law by the specified date (the final vote is scheduled for June 12).
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly procedural and focused on legislative work, emphasizing the advancement of bills (the traffic law, the economy/climate bill) and strict adherence to the procedural timeline. The specific positions are policy-driven, focusing on presenting the results of the committee's work and scheduling the final vote, while supporting the adoption of both proposed bills.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The political stance is strongly opposed to state control and internet censorship, drawing comparisons to the methods used by the Chinese totalitarian regime. It is emphasized that the proposed solutions (such as global authentication using Estonian tools) are neither rational nor realistic. The position is value-based, stressing the protection of individual liberties from excessive state interference.