By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The main opponent is Urmas Reinsalu, who is being criticized extremely intensely and personally for systemic dishonesty and presenting numerical half-truths. The criticism is directed at the opponent's character and methods, not just his political positions. The speaker demands constant fact-checking of the opponent and finds that his presentation is "rubbish."

The opposition is aimed at specific colleagues (Rain, Aleksei, Aivar), and their arguments are being refuted using facts and calculations. The criticism is grounded in policy and data, focusing specifically on assertions regarding the immense burden placed upon the populace and the misstated duration of the economic downturn. The opponents' errors are corrected forthrightly and decisively, with the ultimate goal of completely discrediting their statements.

The primary opponents are Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa) and Rain Epler (EKRE), both of whom are criticized for erroneous calculations and a misunderstanding of market mechanisms. Reinsalu is accused of continually inflating figures and using unreliable sources (Hando Sutter), all delivered with an intense and personal tone. EKRE, meanwhile, is criticized for its excessively pessimistic worldview and claims regarding the "stifling of acute concern."