By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the minister with the title "Esteemed Minister!" The speaker poses a direct, logical question to obtain factual clarification regarding the procedure and conditions set forth in the draft bill.

The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and consistent, which is typical of a parliamentary follow-up question during a briefing session. The speaker employs a logical appeal, citing both the minister's previous statements and expert claims to underscore the significance of the issue. The tone is investigative and demanding, requesting specific information regarding the path forward.

The style is formal and inquisitive, addressing the minister directly and using polite language ("Esteemed Minister"). An analytical approach is employed, focusing on improving the minister's work and assessing a specific situation (the Narva border), while highlighting a humanitarian concern (the long waiting time).

The style is formal and respectful ("Dear Minister," "Thank you"), yet simultaneously direct and specific. The emphasis is placed on posing the question logically and factually to receive a concrete, time-bound answer. Emotional or rhetorical devices are not used.

The rhetorical style is critical, demanding, and concerned, emphasizing the long-term wait experienced by the residents of Ida-Virumaa and the tragic safety statistics. Both logical argumentation (comparing speeds in other countries) and emotional appeal are used (an invitation for the minister to experience the situation firsthand to determine whether it is safe there). The tone shifts to disappointment following the minister’s anticipated response.