By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The style is very formal and respectful, addressing the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the Minister politely ("Esteemed Minister!"). The tone is direct, fact-based, and interrogative, focusing on obtaining specific information.

The rhetorical style is critical and questioning, employing rhetorical questions to challenge the moral justification and necessity of the statement. The tone is direct and focuses on logical arguments concerning international precedent and Estonia’s position. Light irony is used, referencing Estonia being at the forefront "as always."

The style is direct, critical, and demanding, beginning with a sharp procedural reprimand directed at the minister ("stop attacking the Centre Party, answer the questions, and calmly"). The argumentation is logic-based, focusing on highlighting the clear contradiction between the political stances and the provisions of the draft bill. The tone is formal and fact-focused.

The rhetorical style is highly critical and combative, employing powerful metaphors, such as comparing the Reform Party's economic policy to "a Russian rebellion—senseless and ruthless." The speaker balances reliance on economic data with emotional appeals, accusing the government of greed and being detached from reality. The tone is alarming and demanding, particularly when pressing for justifications and analyses concerning the increase in fine rates.

The rhetorical style is factual, critical, and pressing, emphasizing the serious consequences of inaction (the forced leave of doctors and nurses in December). The appeal is primarily logical and data-driven, relying on specific financial indicators and time constraints. In the second speech, he/she employs direct criticism aimed at the minister, accusing him/her of providing an incomplete response.