By Months: Aleksei Jevgrafov

Total Months: 11

Fully Profiled: 11

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
12.2024

4 Speeches

There is no information regarding cooperation, compromises, or cross-party support. While the speaker does reference criticism from Aivar Sõerd, a member of the Reform Party faction, he only uses it to reinforce his own opposition stance.
Details View Details
11.2024

2 Speeches

The style of cooperation is open and inquiring, maintaining respectful communication with the presenter and colleague. Although the bill was initiated by the Centre Party, the speaker demonstrates a willingness to support its objective and jointly seek solutions to ensure its implementation ("Do you have a good solution?").
Details View Details
10.2024

9 Speeches

The cooperation style is focused on seeking solutions, requesting the minister to discuss infrastructure issues (the regulation of communication masts) with another minister. Generally, this involves the direct questioning of ministers, rather than offering cooperation to other members of parliament. Openness to compromise has not been explicitly shown; instead, the government is required to find the solutions.
Details View Details
09.2024

15 Speeches

The style of cooperation is supportive of similar initiatives and fellow party members, such as backing the Centre Party's draft bill on family benefits. Cooperation also involves requesting detailed technical and statistical information from colleagues to strengthen shared legislative objectives.
Details View Details
07.2024

1 Speeches

The speaker emphasizes cooperation with stakeholders and the Riigikogu support group when drafting amendments, referencing, for instance, the proposal concerning large families signed by Igor Taro. Coalition members are urged to consider and find new ways to fill the state budget, which points to a desire to locate alternative points of consensus regarding budgetary issues.
Details View Details
06.2024

16 Speeches

The style of cooperation is oppositional, emphasizing that the Center Party’s proposals (e.g., regarding state fees and fines) have been disregarded by the lead committee. The speaker calls upon other Riigikogu members to vote against the government’s draft legislation, particularly the car tax, thereby seeking support for the opposition's position.
Details View Details
05.2024

23 Speeches

The collaborative approach emphasizes the need for dialogue and inclusion, especially before making sensitive decisions, such as meeting with representatives of the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. Inter-ministerial cooperation (Ministry of Culture, Ministry of Education and Research) is also promoted for the advancement of amateur sports.
Details View Details
04.2024

11 Speeches

The speaker is clearly acting on behalf of the Center Party faction, submitting a draft bill to increase funding for youth extracurricular activities. There is no indication of cooperation with coalition partners; instead, challenges are being presented to parties within the coalition (SDE) regarding their potential shift in position on the issue of voting rights.
Details View Details
03.2024

9 Speeches

The speaker is actively seeking information regarding the role and involvement of local municipalities in the new initiatives, specifically asking what kind of assistance is expected from city governments. On behalf of the City of Narva, he/she is offering a partnership to the Ministry of Culture to secure funding for a major infrastructure project (the Narva stadium), thereby demonstrating a willingness to cooperate between the local and national levels.
Details View Details
02.2024

8 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
01.2024

14 Speeches

There is no data regarding direct cooperation with other political parties. One call includes a question posed to a colleague (Martin) concerning support for a progressive income tax, which suggests an internal discussion during the formulation of political stances.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling