Session Profile: Jüri Jaanson
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
2024-10-17
Political Position
The political stance centers on the principles of the rule of law, strongly advocating for the establishment of retroactive review of court decisions in justified circumstances. The speaker stresses that the principle of legal certainty is not absolute, and it is the duty of the legislature to enable the independent judicial system to conduct legitimate proceedings. This position is personal and deviates from the official stance of the speaker’s parliamentary faction.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the legal field, particularly concerning civil procedure and the review of court judgments. He references specific legal concepts (legal certainty) and different editions of the code (dating back to January 1, 2006). Furthermore, he is aware of the draft bill's prior legislative history in the Riigikogu. He is also up-to-date on the opinions concerning the draft held by both the Government of the Republic and the Ministry of Justice.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and measured, focusing on logical arguments and legal principles. The speaker begins by posing questions to clarify the background of the draft bill, and later explains their position, emphasizing the independence of the judicial system. They use an explanatory tone to substantiate the necessity of judicial review should new circumstances arise.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in the plenary session, beginning by putting two substantive questions to the rapporteur concerning the background of the draft bill and the committee's ruling. Later, the speaker takes the floor to deliver a longer personal statement explaining his support for the bill's underlying principle. He is prepared to publicly break ranks with his parliamentary faction.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is aimed at the representative of the Legal Affairs Committee, who is accused of presenting the matter unilaterally and taking a side. Furthermore, the speaker challenges the Ministry of Justice’s proposal to reject the draft legislation, stressing that the principle of legal certainty is not absolute. The criticism is directed at procedural and political choices, not at individuals.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The working style is independent and detached from the faction, emphasizing personal conviction and legal analysis. The speaker is open to discussion, posing questions to the presenter, but he does not directly reference collaboration with other factions or colleagues. He makes it clear that he is not representing his party, but himself.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on the draft amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure, which addresses the creation of a mechanism for the retroactive reopening of court judgments. The speaker is a strong proponent of the principle underlying this bill, viewing it as an opportunity to guarantee fair proceedings when new circumstances arise. He considers it essential to establish a mechanism enabling the Supreme Court to conduct independent proceedings.
4 Speeches Analyzed