By Years: Züleyxa Izmailova

The style is predominantly critical, passionate, and urgent, especially when criticizing the government's actions, often employing dramatic metaphors ("chicken mince," "dead landscape"). Both emotional appeals (such as the appalling case of Pihlakodu) and logical ones are utilized, referencing studies from the Bank of Estonia, the Estonian Institute of Economic Research, and the Government Office. The speaker poses numerous rhetorical questions to cast doubt on the opponents' motives and political logic.

The rhetoric is formal, yet often sharp and combative, particularly when criticizing procedural deficiencies and the opposing party (e.g., "pull your heads out of strange women's uteruses"). It employs both logical arguments (citing studies and laws) and emotional appeals (poignancy, climate anxiety). The overall tone is frequently anxious and urgent, especially concerning environmental and climate crisis topics.