By Months: Züleyxa Izmailova
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
12.2024
4 Speeches
The style is formal, yet warm and consensus-building, emphasizing shared responsibility and priorities ("regardless of one's worldview or party affiliation"). The speaker employs both logical explanations (refuting misconceptions) and strong emotional appeals, concluding the speeches with a memorable phrase: "One saved child is one saved world." The tone is persuasive and underscores the importance of making children's voices heard.
11.2024
4 Speeches
The speaker adopts a style that is predominantly serious, direct, and often insistent, especially when addressing the climate crisis and the postponement of necessary measures. They utilize both logical arguments (statistics, scientific facts) and sharp, emotional appeals—for instance, when criticizing opponents on the issue of abortion. The tone is critical of the government's inaction and demands that the focus be redirected to "what is most important."
10.2024
4 Speeches
The rhetorical style is largely critical, aggressive, and at times sarcastic, especially concerning parliamentary procedure and attendance. Strong emotional language is employed, such as "shameful conduct" and "an embarrassing state of affairs." The speaker demands accountability and improved leadership, addressing direct questions to the presiding officer.
09.2024
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, courteous, and characteristic of an inquiry, respectfully addressing both the session chair and the minister. The address is brief and focuses on acquiring direct information, maintaining a neutral tone and leaning toward the logical rather than the emotional.
06.2024
5 Speeches
The style is formal and critical, employing both ethical appeals (honesty, admitting errors) and logical arguments (high cost, lack of scientific basis for conviction). The speaker expresses concern regarding the quality of the procedure, posing direct questions to the committee leaders, and concluding with an unambiguous call not to support the draft legislation.
05.2024
2 Speeches
The style is formal and focused on questions, utilizing polite expressions ("respected chair of the session," "dear colleague"). The tone is analytical and skeptical, presenting criticism regarding the superficiality and hurried nature of the draft bill. The appeals are logical and concentrate on clarifying facts and procedures.
04.2024
1 Speeches
The style is formal and analytical, posing a specific question to the minister. The tone is neutral and centers on a logical appeal, utilizing data (0.7 euros, 0.9 euros) to assess the ambition of the goals.
02.2024
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is forceful, emotional, and highly critical, employing strong and condemning expressions such as "Russian army of orcs" and describing the subject matter as "heartbreaking." The speaker combines an emotional appeal (the maiming and killing of children) with an analysis of specific data and political objectives to underscore the gravity of the situation.
01.2024
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is supportive, optimistic, and formal, praising both the draft legislation and the preceding speakers for their "very good speeches." The speech is logic-driven, employing technical and specialized language (e.g., "EU legal act," "circular economy") and citing academic sources. The tone is constructive, also proposing further procedural improvements.