By Plenary Sessions: Züleyxa Izmailova

The main criticism is directed at the governing coalition and state leaders, who are accused of breaking promises and failing to pass the draft bill for a climate-resilient economy. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of postponing real action for years and taking an irresponsibly high level of risk. Also criticized is the general attitude ("Why should we have to do anything?"), which ignores Estonia's high per capita pollution.

Opponents are neither criticized nor mentioned; the speech focuses solely on the positive presentation of the bill and soliciting support.

The main criticism is directed at the initiators of Draft Law 450 (EKRE MPs), who are accused of engaging in displacement activities and are given a sharp personal recommendation to stop interfering in decisions concerning women's bodies. There is also opposition to the socialization of costs related to the burning of fossil fuels, demanding that the polluter bears the responsibility.