By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

Uses a factual and technically precise style, relying on figures and concrete examples. The tone is professional and explanatory, but occasionally defensive regarding accusations made by opponents. It prefers logical arguments over emotional appeals, using practical examples to clarify complex tax comparisons.

Employs a factual and technically detailed approach, relying on specific figures and legal references. The style is explanatory and pedagogical, striving to clearly articulate complex budgetary matters. It maintains an official tone, but also utilizes everyday comparisons (such as equating them with personal budgets) to clarify complex concepts.

The speaker employs the use of questions as the primary means of rhetorical influence, posing several substantive questions in sequence. The style is polite and formal ("Thank you very much, dear chairman! Esteemed presenter"), yet simultaneously direct and analytical. They rely on facts and numerical comparisons to strengthen their arguments.

It employs an explanatory and fact-based approach, honestly acknowledging the unpopularity of tax hikes. The tone is moderate and constructive, seeking to persuade through logical arguments. It utilizes concrete examples and figures, avoiding emotional rhetoric. It publicly makes corrections and clarifications, demonstrating honesty and transparency.

It employs a formal, fact-based style, focusing on an objective overview of the committee's discussion. The tone is neutral and highly informative, avoiding emotional judgments and presenting the viewpoints of various parties in a balanced manner.

Employs thorough, fact-based argumentation, relying on specific figures and legal citations. The style is formal and technically detailed, but also incorporates personal examples and anecdotes (e.g., concerning a millionaire media personality). Criticism is handled calmly, often utilizing irony and humor in responses. The necessity of making pragmatic decisions in the national interest is repeatedly stressed.

It employs an official, neutral, and factual style. Communications are structured, follow clear logic, and include specific dates and references to legislation. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on accuracy and the preservation of formality.