By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

Insufficient data

The speaker does not express personal opposition or criticize any political grouping or policy. He notes that one committee member was against the completion of the first reading, but this constitutes a neutral factual report.

The criticism is mainly directed at Isamaa (for the ironic interpretation of their previous budget recommendations) and EKREIKE (for the large prior deficit of 5.2% of GDP). It disputes the mathematical and definitional claims made by opponents, especially regarding the benefit of abolishing the tax hump for the wealthy and the definition of "governance costs." Furthermore, it rejects the bill initiated by the Center Party parliamentary group concerning motor vehicle tax concessions.

The confrontation is directed at the misconceptions and criticism put forth by colleagues, particularly concerning the difficulties in the coalition's work and the technical details of fund reimbursement. It rejects accusations of neglecting people with disabilities, highlighting a 14 million euro increase in support payments. It defends the legislative process, asserting that critics have "completely misunderstood" something.