By Plenary Sessions: Annely Akkermann

The speaker indirectly criticizes those who recommend taking out more loans and "completing the construction of the state," but avoids naming specific opponents. The criticism targets policy measures rather than individuals, focusing on the dangers of misguided economic policy. He mentions that Jürgen Ligi’s warnings against indexation have become "a voice crying in the wilderness."

A direct opposition stance is not evident in the speeches. Instead, it defends the actions of the government and the commission against criticism, emphasizing the correctness of the procedure and the exemplary pace. Criticism is met calmly, with an attempt to clarify the rationale behind the decisions.

Not enough data

No direct criticism is leveled at specific individuals or parties. Rather, it points to a systemic problem where various European directives contradict one another. It implicitly criticizes the banking sector's overly casual approach to account closures.

The speaker criticizes the conduct of those making presentations, who, in his view, personally attack colleagues and ministers instead of offering substantive arguments. The criticism is procedural and behavioral, not personal, focusing instead on the quality of parliamentary debate.

The amendments proposed by the opposition factions (Isamaa and EKRE) are rejected, based on the unsuitability of using the Government of the Republic’s reserves to cover standing expenditures. The criticism is procedural and fiscal, not personal.

It expresses clear opposition to Russia's actions in Ukraine, using emotionally charged vocabulary ("sowing suffering, death, and destruction with bombs"). The criticism is presented on a moral, rather than a political, basis.