Session Profile: Annely Akkermann
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
2025-04-16
Political Position
The speaker supports the existing Land Tax Act and strongly opposes the bill initiated by the Isamaa faction, which seeks to revert to the version effective at the beginning of 2024. They emphasize that the Government of the Republic unanimously decided against supporting the draft legislation, and that there are no grounds for introducing amendments to the implementation of the current law. This stance is clearly pro-government and anti-reform.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates profound knowledge of the technical aspects of the Land Tax Act, utilizing precise statistical data and percentages. References the expert Lemmi Oro and explains in detail the mechanisms governing land valuation, tax rates, and limits. Demonstrates a sound understanding of local government jurisdiction and the dynamics of land tax revenue collection across various municipalities.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs a factual and technocratic approach, relying on statistics and expert opinions. It honestly acknowledges the limits of its knowledge ("I simply don't know that," "I can't answer"). The style is formal and detailed, focusing on data rather than emotional appeals. The discourse is structured and systematic.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She actively participated in the Finance Committee session on April 8, where the first reading of the draft bill was discussed. He/She serves as the representative of the lead committee and presents the committee's position to the plenary. This involves regular work with the committee's materials and the inclusion of experts in the discussions.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed against the bill initiated by the Isamaa faction, but the criticism is strictly policy-focused, not personal. It relies on the unanimous position of the Government of the Republic and emphasizes that circumstances justifying the need for changes are lacking. The opposition is moderate, but firm.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Cooperates with experts from the Ministry of Finance and relies on their explanations. Refers to the commission's collective work and decisions. Demonstrates a willingness to share information and acknowledge the limits of their own knowledge, which indicates an openness to constructive dialogue.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It specifically mentions the Väike-Maarja municipality as an example of a local government experiencing a decrease in land tax revenue. It emphasizes the autonomy of local governments when establishing tax rates and applying concessions. The focus is more on the nationwide perspective rather than prioritizing specific regions.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports market-based land taxation and the expansion of fiscal opportunities for local municipalities. It emphasizes that the land tax should be based on the market value of the land, and that local governments require diverse revenue bases for providing services. This demonstrates a pragmatic approach to reforming the tax system.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It mentions benefits for pensioners and the repressed within the context of land tax, but does not take clear positions on broader social issues. It focuses primarily on technical tax policy, rather than on social values or ideological questions.
7 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on maintaining the Land Tax Act in its current wording and opposing any reversion to the status existing at the beginning of 2024. It emphasizes the correctness of the legislative process and the thoroughness of the committee's work. It recommends the rejection of the draft bill within the committee, which signals a clear position on the proposed legislative amendment.
7 Speeches Analyzed