By Months: Annely Akkermann
Total Months: 11
Fully Profiled: 11
12.2024
48 Speeches
He sharply criticizes the Isamaa faction’s amendments, calling them technically non-compliant and formally deficient. He dismisses the opposition’s accusations of insufficient oversight but acknowledges the technical quality of the Centre Party’s proposals. He ironically recommends "remedial lessons" to Urmas Reinsalu.
11.2024
61 Speeches
He criticized Isamaa's alternative budget for being formally deficient, labeling it "political satire." He dismissed EKRE's accusations regarding issues with the performance-based budget, stressing that it was the EKRE-IKE government that had implemented this very system. He criticized members of the opposition for the incorrectness of their amendments, but gave credit to those who submitted technically sound proposals.
10.2024
16 Speeches
It directly criticizes Martin Helme and Aivar Kokk for opposing the tax bill, specifically mentioning their dissenting votes. It rejects the opposition's claims that tax hikes will stifle economic growth, presenting counterarguments. It also criticizes the policies of the previous government, calling the dismantling of the second pension pillar a "cynical mistake."
09.2024
5 Speeches
A critical stance towards Isamaa's tax policy proposals, labeling their suggestion a "fictional tax burden." Isamaa is criticized for submitting an identical draft bill, but this is done on procedural grounds, not personally. The opposition's attitude is politically pragmatic rather than ideological.
07.2024
52 Speeches
The speaker criticizes the opposition's obstructionist tactics, specifically the submission of 831 amendments, which he deems devoid of substance and insincere. He clearly distinguishes between the President's justified criticism and the opposition's formal obstacles, stressing that the President's remarks are constructive and help improve the legislation. The criticism is procedural rather than personal.
06.2024
69 Speeches
Criticizes the opposition's amendments as vague and populist, particularly the Isamaa faction’s proposals to cut 200 million euros without specifying the source of the funds. Rejects Urmas Reinsalu's claims regarding the cumulation of the registration fee as erroneous. Nevertheless, maintains a constructive tone and acknowledges that some of the opposition's concerns are justified.
05.2024
22 Speeches
Offers moderate criticism of the amendments proposed by the opposition factions (Isamaa and EKRE), justifying their rejection with technical and financial arguments. Criticism is also expressed regarding excessive indexing, which is deemed dangerous for state finances. Personal attacks are avoided, with the focus remaining strictly on the substance of the policy.
04.2024
4 Speeches
It does not express direct confrontations, but notes the withdrawal of EKRE's 200 amendments and the non-support for Isamaa's five proposals in the committee. The attitude towards the opposition is rather neutral and procedural, not personal or ideological. It emphasizes consensus decisions within the committee.
03.2024
12 Speeches
The speaker voices cautious criticism concerning the proposals to reduce VAT, highlighting that food prices increased last year even though the VAT rate was unchanged, and sellers' profits grew. He avoids personal attacks, focusing instead on the political argument.
02.2024
16 Speeches
He sharply criticizes draft legislation that would cut tax revenues without a clear target group (such as lowering income tax to 15% or reducing VAT on foodstuffs). He expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of tax relief, arguing that these measures primarily benefit the wealthy. He consistently supports the rejection of bills that do not align with his liberal principles.
01.2024
80 Speeches
Clear opposition to the tax policy changes initiated by EKRE, consistently advocating for their rejection. Critical of the proposals put forth by Martin Helme and other EKRE representatives. A specific point is made regarding EKRE MPs who "advocate for different tax rates in different circles," highlighting their inconsistency. This opposition is primarily grounded in political and economic arguments.