Agenda Profile: Annely Akkermann
First reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (220 SE)
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker took a clear stance against the draft amendment to the Value-Added Tax Act, supporting the committee's proposal to reject the bill. They also pointed out that the government did not support the bill either, indicating congruence with the government's position.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
They showed a good grasp of parliamentary procedure, specifically mentioning the seven-week rule and the dates of the committee sessions. They demonstrated knowledge of the legislative process procedures and deadlines.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Employs a factual, neutral, and official tone. Speaks briefly and concretely, focusing on procedural aspects without emotional assessments. The second sentence is very short and direct.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient information based on data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Does not express direct criticism towards individuals or parties, but notes neutrally that no questions were asked of Martin Helme, the presenter of the draft bill. The opposition is procedural rather than personal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
He mentions his appointment as a representative to the steering committee, which demonstrates institutional cooperation. He refers to the committee's joint decision regarding the rejection of the draft proposal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient information based on the data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Even though this is a debate about the VAT Act, the speaker fails to present any specific economic viewpoints or elaborate on the financial reasons for rejecting the proposal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient information based on the data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on the organizational aspects of the legislative process, particularly adherence to deadlines and the coordination of committee work. It supports the rejection of the draft bill, which demonstrates the role of quality control in legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed