By Plenary Sessions: Diana Ingerainen
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker does not criticize or name any specific opposing party. They focus instead on procedural deficiencies, such as the lack of transparency and insufficient impact assessments, but avoid using an aggressive tone.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is moderate and procedural, criticizing the timing of the government’s or ministry’s action on the grounds that the matter should have been resolved earlier. The criticism is directed at the efficiency and speed of the activity.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at those who unjustifiably expand the topic under discussion into other domains, which suggests a desire to keep the scope of the law narrow and specific. The critique itself is rather substantive and low-intensity, focusing on defending the focus of the draft bill.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at a specific draft bill, the rejection of which was recommended by the commission's majority. The criticism is both procedural and political, as the speaker is conveying the voting results, which show a clear division (5 in favor of rejection, 2 against).
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
There is not enough data.