By Years: Lauri Hussar

The opposition has primarily focused on procedural violations, criticizing the interpretations made by the session chair and colleagues who stray from the topic (e.g., Helir-Valdor Seeder's question). Substantively, it criticizes inaccurate economic data and the Moscow Patriarchate's attempts to justify Kirill's actions as those of a private individual. The criticism is sharp, particularly concerning procedural rules.

The confrontation primarily plays out on the technical and constitutional levels of draft legislation initiated by others. He criticizes the proposal of a specific colleague (Lauri) as a potentially unconstitutional "flaw" or "defect" concerning the effective date, emphasizing strict legal correctness.