By Months: Lauri Hussar

The confrontation is directed primarily at the ambiguous limits of Parliament's rules of procedure and the potential passivity of the presiding officer when enforcing those rules. The criticism is procedural, not personal, and also addresses the minister's obligation to provide factual answers.

There is too little data.

The criticism is aimed at colleagues who fail to keep their questions relevant to the topic, as well as the presiding officer of the session, whose interpretation of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act is being challenged. The objection is strictly procedural, citing Helir-Valdor Seeder’s question as a prime example.

Insufficient data

The primary opposition is aimed at the Estonian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, accusing them of skillful deception in connection with justifying Russia's aggression. In the economic debate, criticism has been leveled against the accuracy of the data and claims presented by the rapporteur, with demands being made for the submission of evidence concerning Lithuanian taxation.