By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Hussar

There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at political opponents. The only comparison made is with the Latvians regarding the length of the presidential election process, noting that Estonia held out longer. The criticism is directed more towards the parliament’s previous conduct (for instance, poor attendance in 2014), rather than at political opponents.

There is no direct confrontation; the speaker handles disagreements gently, referring to those who have not signed the initiative as potential supporters. He assumes that their desire is to make things even better, but emphasizes the importance of political agreements.

The primary opposition is directed at the bill's proponent ("Dear Lauri") and his team concerning the procedural deficiencies in the drafting of the legislation. The criticism is intense and grounded in legal arguments, asserting that the bill is an unconstitutional, defective draft that cannot possibly be approved.

No data available.