By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party (Kristen Michal, Kaja Kallas, Jürgen Ligi) and government institutions (the Electoral Service, the Electoral Commission, the Supreme Court). The criticism is both policy- and procedure-based, accusing opponents of outright lying, corruption ("a small clique operating through mutual guarantees"), and organizing a coup d'état. A willingness to compromise is lacking, especially on the issues of e-elections and military intervention in Ukraine, which are considered dangerous for Estonia.

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is being called the biggest security threat to Estonia and Tartu due to their political and budgetary decisions. The criticism is intense and widespread, encompassing political decisions, procedural errors, and the government's incompetence. Justice Minister Liisa Pakosta and Valdo Randpere are criticized separately; compromise is ruled out, and the immediate rejection of the draft bill is demanded.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and its political leadership, who are accused of leaving the country undefended and jeopardizing internal security. The criticism is intense and encompasses political failure, incompetence (e.g., Herem), and accusations of lying to the public. Compromise is ruled out because the government’s actions are viewed as a degradation of Estonia’s dignity.

The main opponents are Eesti 200 and Kristen Michal’s government, who are accused of pathological lying, demagoguery, and undermining the dignity of the Estonian state. The criticism is intense, personal, and rooted in moral principles, calling into question the government's standards and trustworthiness. The opposition is absolute and uncompromising.