By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The main opposition is aimed at the government, which is sharply criticized for making decisions without prior impact assessments or calculations. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of supporting the accession without knowing what consequences it would have for Estonia. It is also separately highlighted that cheap Ukrainian production is already causing problems for neighboring countries due to dumping.

The primary criticism is leveled against the ruling party and the coalition, who stand accused of driving the Estonian populace into poverty and steering businesses toward bankruptcy. The critique centers on policy and priorities, highlighting misguided spending (e.g., Rail Baltic, green subsidies) and unnecessary taxation. The intensity of these attacks is high, and there is no willingness to compromise.

The main opponents are the minister, his predecessor, the deputy chancellor, and coalition members of parliament, who have been dubbed the "liberal regime." The criticism is intense, focusing on ethical violations, cover-ups, and impunity, specifically accusing them of hiring a lobbyist. Compromise has been ruled out; instead, demands are being made for political accountability and a vote of no confidence.