By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The economic outlook is presented in a negative light, highlighting the siphoning off of taxpayer funds through corruption scandals (for example, 6 million euros in the Lehtme case, and 5–6 million euros related to the COVID testing procurement). There is a demand for economic benefit analyses concerning the prisoner project, underscoring the necessity of guaranteeing financial gain for the state.

The economic outlook is strongly opposed to government tax hikes and regulation, arguing that these measures have "run the economy into the ground." The speaker sharply criticizes the permanent establishment of temporary taxes and the supposed tax relief, calling the latter a false claim. It is emphasized that people lack the money to pay bills and buy food, prioritizing the financial well-being and solvency of the populace.

Economic views are fiscally critical, opposing government spending (corruption related to the green transition, LGBT costs) and the tax hike spree. It is emphasized that hiring additional prison guards will not improve the national economy, and the state must not sell itself out at the expense of security, deeming such revenue entirely negligible.

The economic perspective involves criticism concerning how large infrastructure projects (wind energy) are being implemented. Emphasis is placed on suspicions that the rapid progression of these projects is linked to corruption and vast sums of money, specifically citing 2.6 billion euros.