Session Profile: Mart Helme
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2025-11-05
Political Position
The political position focuses heavily on national security and civil defense, sharply criticizing the Reform Party's cultivated myth of "security being in safe hands" and highlighting existing security vulnerabilities. The speaker deems the situation critical and catastrophically poor, especially concerning mass evacuation and the logistics of supplies during a crisis. The platform is strongly oppositional and results-driven, demanding accountability for work left undone and for irresponsible spending.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of national defense and civil protection, referencing the National Defense Committee's report and highlighting logistical problems (e.g., food reserves sufficient for only 10% of the population). Furthermore, they are familiar with the findings of the State Audit Office concerning irresponsible spending and the missing 700 million euros. They also employ the deductive method and logic when resolving procedural matters.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is urgent, critical, and confrontational, employing strong phrases such as "a very serious alarm signal" and "in a catastrophically bad situation." The appeals are primarily logical (referencing traffic congestion and shortages of supplies), but delivered with high intensity, demanding specific accountability. The speaker also utilizes a historical and internal security framework ("fifth column") in the context of the plundering of Sinimäed.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is participating in the Riigikogu information session, posing questions to the Prime Minister. He/She refers back to his/her previous question regarding internal security and mentions the Sunday evening drive from Tartu to Tallinn, which provided the impetus for addressing the issue of civil defense.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, whose long-term security policies are considered failures, and at the government for irresponsible spending. The speaker demands specific accountability from the prime minister and accuses the state of being toothless in preventing anti-Estonian activity, referencing the desecration of Sinimäed. The criticism is policy- and accountability-based, not personal, although it does demand that specific individuals take responsibility.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
No data available
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national security and civil protection, using the highway between Tallinn and Tartu as an example in the context of evacuation. Separately, emphasis is placed on the repeated vandalism and plundering of the Sinimäed complex as a problem of internal security and national dignity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Information on general economic views is missing, but the speaker sharply criticizes irresponsible spending and the evaporation of 700 million euros, directly linking the lack of fiscal responsibility to security gaps.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among the social issues raised are the problems of internal security and the "fifth column," focusing specifically on the repeated desecration of the Sinimäe Legionaries' complex. The speaker criticizes the state's failure to utilize camera technology (e-state capabilities) to prevent and identify such anti-Estonian activities, suggesting that historical inertia facilitates these kinds of incidents.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker references the processing of the camera legislation, but the primary focus is on demanding accountability and readiness from the government, based on the conclusions of existing national defense and civil protection reports. He/She is critical of the current procedures (the rules for supplementary questions).
2 Speeches Analyzed