Session Profile: Mart Helme
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
2024-01-16
Political Position
The political focus is currently directed at assessing the performance and professionalism of state institutions, particularly the Prosecutor's Office and the Central Criminal Police. The speaker adopts a fiercely critical position, leveling accusations against the Prosecutor's Office for unprofessionalism, abuse of power, and being utilized as a political instrument. Key issues revolve around the protracted investigation into the "Slava Ukraini" abuses and the alleged political repression (the Kert Kingo case). This stance is strongly opposed to institutional inefficiency and demands accountability.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of high-level criminal investigations and the operations of procedural institutions, specifically referencing the Prosecutor's Office and the Central Criminal Police. This knowledge has been applied to analyze procedural failures and political consequences, indicating familiarity with the details of the Slava Ukraini and Kert Kingo cases.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly accusatory and combative, employing strong language directed at the Prosecutor's Office, such as "abuses its power" and "falsifies documents." The speaker presents their views as rhetorical questions, emphasizing themes of institutional injustice and unprofessionalism. The appeal itself is rather emotional and value-based, centering on the lack of justice.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, participating in debates held within the framework of interpellations and posing follow-up questions. This pattern of activity indicates involvement in the parliament's oversight function, focusing on addressing current scandals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is directed at state law enforcement agencies, particularly the Prosecutor's Office and the Central Criminal Police. The criticism is intense and concerns both procedural failures (sloppy investigation) and ethical conduct (abuse of power, document forgery). The Prosecutor's Office is directly called a political instrument for carrying out repression.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise with other political forces.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national institutional and political scandals concerning the functioning of the legal system and the misuse of international aid (Slava Ukraini). There is no specific regional or local emphasis.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Information regarding economic positions (taxes, regulations, fiscal policy) is unavailable. While the investigation into the misuse of funds (Slava Ukraini) is covered, the broader economic policy is not addressed.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The address concerns legal issues and civil liberties in connection with the activities of the Prosecutor's Office, citing potential repression and unjust treatment (the Kert Kingo case). The emphasis is placed on the violation of the principles of the rule of law and the political bias of institutions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
There is no legislative focus; the emphasis is on the parliamentary oversight and holding existing law enforcement agencies accountable for their activities. The context of the discussion is a question following an interpellation, which is an act of oversight, not lawmaking.
1 Speeches Analyzed