Agenda Profile: Mart Helme

New taxes

2024-04-03

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

Political Position
The most important issue is ensuring the accountability and accuracy of respondents during information sessions and debates. The political position is strongly focused on procedural effectiveness, requiring that questions be answered directly and forthrightly, while avoiding demagogic tricks. The objective is to find a mechanism allowing the questioner to call the respondent to order and ensure an answer is provided.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The expertise is evident in the knowledge of parliamentary procedure and the rules governing Question Time (information sessions). The speaker focuses on procedural problems, such as evading answers, posing counter-questions, and employing demagogic techniques.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is critical and procedural, emphasizing the necessity of addressing the respondents' persistent evasion of questions. Formal language and logical appeal are employed, focusing on the identification of demagogic techniques. The tone is concerned and demanding, highlighting a systemic problem.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker refers to previous and recurring debates held during Q&A sessions and other formats, which demonstrates regular and active participation in parliamentary scrutiny and question rounds.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the respondents (likely government representatives), who are criticized for employing demagogic tricks, responding with counter-questions, and outright refusing to answer the questions. The criticism is intense and centers on procedural unfairness and the avoidance of accountability.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is aimed at improving procedural rules to give questioners the ability to call respondents to order. The speaker is either initiating or supporting the creation of a mechanism that would ensure answers are received during parliamentary scrutiny.

1 Speeches Analyzed