Agenda Profile: Mart Helme

The political focus centers on the colossal capacity of Chinese cyber intelligence operating in Estonia and the incompetence of the government—particularly the minister—in assessing this threat. The speaker urgently stresses the necessity of establishing civilian control over Estonia's special services to put an end to their interference in politics. The underlying framework is strongly results-oriented, criticizing both past diplomatic blunders and the current state of inaction. He places Estonia’s security challenges within the context of the global confrontation between the US and China, deeming this more significant than the events unfolding in Ukraine.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise regarding Chinese intelligence operations, covering both historical methods (the 1990s) and contemporary digital techniques (cyber intelligence, artificial intelligence, smart devices). He leverages personal experience from visits to China and his former role as Deputy Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, offering specific locational knowledge (an intelligence center situated near the Central Market). He stresses the colossal capabilities of Chinese intelligence and the extent to which Western nations lag behind in this domain.

The speaker’s style is highly combative and critical, utilizing personal experiences (a visit to China in 1990, work at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) to establish their authority. The emphasis is placed on emotional and dramatic claims (e.g., Chinese intelligence knows when the minister went to the toilet) and labeling the government as incompetent. Direct accusations of political interference, fabrication, and corruption within the Estonian intelligence services are employed.

The speaker actively participated in the debate on the interpellation, delivering two consecutive speeches, which indicates the priority he/she places on this specific topic. He/She referred to his/her previous work as the Undersecretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as personal observations made in China and Estonia (e.g., the location of the Chinese intelligence center near the Central Market).

The main opponents are an incompetent minister and the Estonian special services, who are accused of interfering in politics, fabricating court cases against the opposition, and engaging in corrupt financial transactions. The criticism is extremely intense, and the accusations are leveled against both the political leadership and the unethical activities of the intelligence agencies. He/She also criticizes Estonia’s previous diplomacy, which was too generous toward China.

Not enough data.

The focus is strongly international, placing Estonian security within the context of the major confrontation between the USA and China, while also mentioning Ukraine, the Middle East, and the Far East. At the national level, attention is concentrated on Chinese intelligence activity in Estonia, referencing specific locations in Tallinn (near Keskturg/Central Market, Juhkentali street).

The speaker sharply criticizes the Estonian government's expenditures, particularly those related to aid for Ukraine and the establishment of a defense industry, labeling them as pointless posturing and corrupt siphoning of funds. He highly praises China's pragmatic approach, which ensures success before action is taken, contrasting this with Estonia's failed ventures.

Insufficient data.

The primary priority is establishing civilian control over Estonia's special services to prevent their interference in politics and information operations. The speaker is acting as both a critic and an advocate, stressing that this is the minister's foremost duty before addressing foreign intelligence matters. He also mentioned concerns regarding Huawei and TikTok, pointing to the necessity of regulating digital technology.