Session Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
2025-05-14
Political Position
The dominant themes are opposition to the green transition, especially concerning CO2 regulations, which are labeled a "racket" and a "big lie," and the protection of private property against state nationalization carried out under the guise of nature conservation. The political position is strongly value-driven and anti-regulation, emphasizing individual freedoms and economic common sense. Furthermore, a significant issue is the resistance to gender quotas and gender ideology, stressing the importance of selection based purely on expertise.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge regarding the atmospheric concentration of CO2 (0.004%) and international energy policy (specifically, that democratic countries utilize fossil fuels), citing examples from the USA, India, and Norway. Furthermore, they demonstrate personal and detailed knowledge concerning the economic value of private forestry and the relevant legislative procedures (the House Rules and Procedures Act currently under OE proceedings). When supporting their arguments, they emphasize the mathematical and scientific reasoning provided by colleagues (Epler, Helme).
24 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is predominantly combative, confrontational, and sarcastic, particularly when criticizing opponents (liberals, the coalition). The speaker employs strong emotional appeals and colorful metaphors, labeling draft legislation a "Trojan horse" and the CO2 market "selling air." They frequently use personal examples (as a private forest owner) and rhetorical questions, accusing opponents of fearmongering and manipulation.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speeches were concentrated on two session days (May 14 and 15), indicating active participation in the plenary debates, evidenced by the submission of numerous questions and responses. This pattern demonstrates a commitment to opposing the ideological and economic bills currently on the agenda.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are "liberals" and the coalition parties (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats), who are accused of hypocrisy, increasing bureaucracy, and ideological coercion. The criticism is sharp, escalating from political arguments to personal accusations, such as highlighting the unfair harassment of Kert Kingo and the Taavi Rõivas plane incident. There is no willingness to compromise; the focus is solely on exposing the actions and motives of the opponents.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The individual relies on the arguments put forth by fellow faction members (Rain Epler, Martin Helme) and other conservatives (Priit Sibul), citing them approvingly. There is no cooperation with other parties or willingness to compromise; the focus remains squarely on exposing the ideologies of opponents and criticizing their activities.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is primarily on national and ideological topics, but a regional connection becomes apparent through the role of the private forest owner. This is mentioned explicitly in the context of the Haanja protected area, highlighting the violation of private forest owners' rights when nature conservation restrictions are imposed.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
A strong anti-regulatory stance, particularly concerning gender quotas for listed companies and green transition regulations, which are viewed as bureaucratic and detrimental to national wealth. It fiercely defends private property, labeling any restrictions as nationalization and demanding fair, market-value compensation from the state. Furthermore, it criticizes the high state expenditure resulting from the payment of these compensations.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Strong opposition to gender-based selection and the regulation of gender balance, emphasizing the importance of expertise. It denies the existence of equality and fairness, warning against the tyrannical consequences of their regulatory imposition. It sharply opposes the expansion of gender ideology, questioning the future inclusion of social genders (vulasoolised) and criticizing the Minister of Education's positions.
24 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
He/She primarily acts as an opponent and critic of draft legislation, centering attention on three key themes: the regulation of gender balance on the boards of listed companies (which is strongly opposed and viewed as over-regulation), nature conservation restrictions affecting private forests (seen as a violation of the constitution), and the Aviation Safety Act (which is utilized to criticize opponents). Attention is also paid to procedural issues regarding the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules.
24 Speeches Analyzed