Agenda Profile: Helle-Moonika Helme
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Political Position
The political position is strongly aimed at amending the State Budget Act, primarily stressing the mandatory presentation of expenditure allocation based on economic substance, and the imposition of limits on ministers and institutions. These viewpoints are policy- and procedure-centric, seeking to improve the draft bill's wording and test the opposition party's trustworthiness. The speaker firmly supports their submitted amendment proposal, deeming it better than the committee's version.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the details of the state budget structure and financial reporting, emphasizing the mandatory requirement to present expenditures according to their economic classification. Furthermore, they are familiar with the legislative procedure, referencing committee decisions, minutes, and the quality of the drafting of amendments.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is predominantly confrontational and procedural, utilizing logical arguments to demonstrate the superiority of its proposal. The speaker escalates political tension by labeling the vote a vote of confidence, thereby forcing the opposing party to publicly confirm their position. There is also a brief apology for a technical malfunction, which indicates sensitivity regarding the decorum of the chamber.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The Member is actively participating in the second reading of the state budget bill, making several interventions within a short timeframe concerning both technical procedures and bringing substantive amendments to a vote. This pattern of activity is aimed at pushing through specific changes and challenging political opponents.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is aimed at the Reform Party, whose political consistency and credibility are being put to the test. The criticism is political and procedural, forcing the party to vote either for or against a proposal supported by its former minister (Jürgen Ligi). The opposition is intense, as the vote is being transformed into a vote of confidence.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker points to cooperation with colleagues ("Raini and Martin's proposal"), highlighting the teamwork involved in drafting the amendments. The tone adopted in the chamber is quite assertive, focusing on forcing a vote on their specific version and testing the political consistency of the opposition, rather than seeking compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspectives stress fiscal discipline and budget transparency. Support is given to the mandatory submission of expenditure breakdowns based on economic substance, as well as setting limits for ministers and constitutional institutions. This indicates a clear desire to enhance the state budget's oversight and accountability.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is squarely on the draft Act amending the State Budget Act (Bill 511 SE). The speaker is the initiator and proponent of amendments regarding the budget structure and reporting obligations, deeming their own proposals superior in both substance and wording to the solutions offered by the committee.
3 Speeches Analyzed