By Years: Anti Haugas

The rhetorical style is formal, logical, and analytical, relying on facts, international examples, and legal clarity. The tone is predominantly serious and argumentative, emphasizing efficiency and purposefulness in both the economy and security. Strong moral language is employed, calling Patriarch Kirill a war criminal and criticizing the enrichment of merchants through ineffective measures.

The style is predominantly formal, analytical, and procedural, especially in the reports of the legal committee, where emphasis is placed on consensual decisions and technical details. Criticism directed at the opposition is sharp and procedural, accusing them of obstruction and labeling their actions an "embarrassing circus." The arguments are mostly logical and pragmatic, focusing on efficiency and costs.