By Years: Andre Hanimägi

The tone is mostly factual and analytical, especially when introducing draft legislation, but becomes sharp and combative in political debates. He/She uses strong language (e.g., "total falsehood," "a blunder," "political froth") and rhetorical questions to highlight the incompetence or hypocrisy of opponents. He/She emphasizes statesmanship and pragmatism, contrasting these qualities with political rhetoric, and uses emotional language when discussing victims of fraud or human rights.

The speaker's style is predominantly formal, analytical, and measured, particularly when presenting the work of committees, where they emphasize consensus-based decisions. They frequently employ rhetorical questions to challenge the logic and motives of opponents. While they rely heavily on data and legal precision, they also utilize emotional appeals when addressing social issues, such as discussing the impact of the war in Ukraine on children or supporting the parents of sick children.