Session Profile: Kalle Grünthal
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
2024-01-11
Political Position
The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on defending the rights of the parliament and criticizing the coalition's "us-versus-them bill methodology." The main themes relate to the freedom of legislative initiative and prioritizing the resolution of issues affecting citizens. The speaker defends the right of Members of Parliament to initiate legislation, even if the relevant work is already underway within the ministry. The overall position is heavily procedural and normative.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates strong expertise in the principles of civil law ("that which is not prohibited is permitted") and the burden of proof. Particular emphasis is placed on knowledge of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and constitutional norms, requiring precise information regarding the specific norm under which supplementary sessions are held. Technical language is employed concerning procedural stages and the justifications for rejecting draft legislation.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, focusing on legal and procedural logic. Sharp rhetorical questions are employed to challenge the legitimacy of the actions taken by the coalition and the ministry, such as inquiries regarding constitutional amendments. The tone is demanding and stresses the necessity of consensus and tolerance when addressing the real-life issues faced by people.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the plenary session, participating in several debates concerning the processing of draft legislation and adherence to the rules governing the Riigikogu agenda. He/She communicates directly with colleagues (Varro Vooglaid, Karmen Joller, Liisa Pakosta) as well as with the legal advisor to the Riigikogu Legal Affairs Committee. The pattern of activity indicates a focus on the procedural correctness of the sessions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary conflict is with the coalition, which is being criticized for the political rejection of draft legislation—a move that threatens to send the bill to the "trash heap." The Ministry is also under fire for ostensibly restricting the right of initiative of Members of Parliament, using the justification that the work is already underway. The criticism is directed at the methodology and procedures, not the individuals, and demands consensus across political lines.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker advocates finding consensus and tolerance, emphasizing that the opposition has quite often supported government bills as well. Appreciation is expressed for the relevant remarks made by colleagues Joller and Lutsar, indicating a readiness for cooperation and for moving the bill forward to the second reading. It is demanded that family doctors also have a say in the legislative process.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The topic of registering home births is being addressed, emphasizing the need to resolve a problem that affects real people. The approach is pragmatic and legal, seeking to ensure that permitted activities are also verifiable, and upholding the civil law principle that anything not prohibited is permitted.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is centered on the transparency and legality of the proceedings, particularly concerning the draft bill on the registration of home births. The speaker supports these initiatives, calling for the bills to be moved forward to the second reading and for the right of initiative held by members of parliament to be respected. Strict compliance with the rules governing the Riigikogu's agenda and the conduct of its sessions is also a crucial priority.
4 Speeches Analyzed