Agenda Profile: Kalle Grünthal
Interpellation concerning the use of electronic cigarettes (No. 377)
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to bans, especially concerning e-cigarette flavor liquids, citing the ineffectiveness of the US Prohibition era in the 1920s as an example. This position is policy-based, emphasizing that prohibitions create a dangerous black market and preferring controlled, precise regulation instead of outright banning.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the consequences of banning flavored e-cigarette liquids in Estonia, citing the activities of domestic chemists and the goods being offered in parking lots. The analysis relies on highlighting historical examples (US Prohibition) and the public health dangers (deaths caused by illegally produced substances).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and logical, employing historical analogy (Prohibition) to support the argument. The tone is concerned and focuses on clarifying the consequences of the policy, emphasizing that "nothing can be achieved through a ban."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is too little data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the current prohibition policy, which is deemed ineffective and dangerous because it encourages underground production. The opposition is policy-driven, focusing on the failure of the chosen legislative method (prohibition) to protect public health.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There isn't enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national policy (the ban established in Estonia) and international historical and contemporary examples (Prohibition in the United States and the cases involving illegally produced goods there).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views address the impact of regulation on the market, emphasizing that a prohibition leads to uncontrolled and dangerous underground production. A controlled and precise legal market is preferred to ensure product safety.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social focus is on public health and consumer protection, emphasizing that bans do not protect citizens but rather increase health risks (deaths and injuries) due to illegally produced goods. This position supports controlled availability to balance civil liberties and safety.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on reviewing the existing ban on e-cigarette flavor liquids. The speaker supports an initiative that aims for the controlled and precise legalization of these prohibited items, thereby mitigating the risks associated with the black market.
1 Speeches Analyzed