Agenda Profile: Kalle Grünthal
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to Draft Bill 536 SE, emphasizing that the constitution should not be amended based on the current political climate, but must instead be rooted in established values. The opposition is both value-based (viewing the constitution as a national and cultural document) and procedural, criticizing the rushing of the bill and the disregard for legislative rules. The speaker relies on the opinion of the Chancellor of Justice to reinforce their stance.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of constitutional law, legislative procedures, and legal drafting technique. In particular, the violation of good law-making principles is emphasized, referencing the necessity for a drafting intent, a concept paper, and an ex-post impact assessment. Detailed knowledge is also presented regarding the voting requirements for amending the constitution (a two-thirds majority) and the analogous application thereof under the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, utilizing extensive legal and theoretical terminology (e.g., constituting, legislative drafting technique, analogy). The tone is predominantly critical and occasionally accusatory, particularly when highlighting procedural shortcomings, where the opposing side is accused of having "slept through" the draft legislation. The appeals are primarily logical and legal, rather than emotional.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker's engagement is evident during the Riigikogu session, where they actively participated in the question round concerning the first reading of the draft act on amending the constitution. All three interventions were brief, focusing on specific legal and procedural details related to the handling of the bill.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at the proponents of the draft bill, who are sharply criticized for procedural violations and rushing the development of the law. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the opposing party of disregarding existing law (the rules of good legislative practice) and acting solely based on the current political climate.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on the national level, addressing issues related to amending the constitution and the working procedures of the Riigikogu. While there is a mention of the unknown number of Russians in the city, this serves merely as an illustration of the bill's inadequate preparation, rather than constituting a regional focus.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The treatment of social issues is implicit, emphasizing the constitution's role as a national-cultural document designed to ensure peaceful coexistence. It is also stressed that the formation of the constitution must be based on deeply rooted beliefs and values.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on opposing the draft act amending the constitution (Bill 536 SE). The speaker is a strong opponent who concentrates on the procedural correctness of the legislative process and the strict application of Riigikogu voting rules (including the requirement for a two-thirds majority).
3 Speeches Analyzed