Kalle Grünthal

Kalle Grünthal (EKRE, right-wing) was extremely active, repeatedly raising procedural questions concerning the lack of a threat assessment from the Security Police Board and challenging the minister’s claims that Sweden would cover absolutely all costs related to the agreement.

Kalle Grünthal was the most active speaker, raising questions concerning both the substance of the draft bill (the issue of DIY repair and manufacturer monopolies) and the procedural organization of the Riigikogu. His questions were critical, focusing on consumer interests and the transfer of costs.

The most active speaker was Kalle Grünthal (pid: UZO6xIIvIiQ), the draft's initiator and representative of the starting point. He led the main part of the discussion and presented and developed the core theses concerning the public impact of ending daylight saving time on health and society. Considering his activity and the role associated with it, he could be marked as "other" position (speaker/presenter), not with a definite left or right political alignment.

The most active speaker was Kalle Grünthal (Estonia 200 faction). He spoke more concisely both earlier and later, and his role in the discussions was to lead the focus and provide parliamentary lobbying; his political affiliation falls under the “other” category (a centrist/eclectic umbrella party).

The most active speaker was Kalle Grünthal (pidocking: UZO6xIIvIiQ), who asked two questions regarding the draft. His representative role is that of a consensus member of the Riigikogu; his position was “other” (not definitively left- or right-wing). He is active in discussions, directing the focus to the nuances of the basic account regulation and the considerations involved.

The most active speaker was Member of the Riigikogu UZO6xIIvIiQ, who delivered three speeches during this session. His position on the Riigikogu party scale is “other” (there is no clear database identifying a successful affiliation or a precise party identifier in this documentation). He highlighted the content of the draft bill, recalled language and oversight issues, and discussed competition and regulation of information society services; he also made references to lobbying and market influences.

Kalle Grünthal, from the EKRE faction, a right-wing political representative, was the most active speaker in this agenda item and delivered two speeches (speech 5 and 7). His participation demonstrates strong engagement and a leading role in the debate; he voiced strong criticism while simultaneously emphasizing the need to understand the potential uses of the protocol, but his remarks were, in several moments, the focus of attention due to a lack of clarity. Regardless of his viewpoints, he showed significant involvement and influence in the debate. (position: right)

The most active speaker was Kalle Grünthal, a member of the EKRE faction (the right-wing political side). His long and rambling discussion focused on criticism of the bill, the topic of infrasound and the health effects of wind turbines, and presented specific observations regarding the possibility of suspending regulations before the completion of more detailed studies. Grünthal's active participation reflects a strong opposing perspective, and his role was noticeably expressed in the parliamentary discussion.

The most active participant throughout this agenda was Kalle Grünthal (pid: UZO6xIIvIiQ). He raised more questions and topics, focusing primarily on oversight issues, the redistribution of responsibilities between ministries, and the functioning of the space agency, as well as questions regarding the prevention of potential segregation. His participation was significant, and he continued to pay close attention with several subsequent questions and comments, indicating his role as a participant focused on the issues of “change proposals” and the practical impact of the draft. Position: other.

The role of the most active speaker was Kalle Grünthal; a representative who holds an oppositional or separate position in Parliament, but whose precise party affiliation is not detailed in this text. He could be classified as holding a "other" (muu) political position, representing a position that does not directly fall into a left- or right-wing triangle.