By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The rhetorical style is urgent and critical, diagnosing a deep problem (stagnation) and demanding radical change. It employs emotional and philosophical appeals, such as "a new time of awakening" and the liberation of the "free spirit." The address is structured as questions directed at the presenter, emphasizing the necessity of action.

The style is formal, repetitive, and pressuring, focusing on obtaining a concrete answer regarding the issue of political accountability. The speaker repeats their question multiple times to emphasize the importance of the topic and prevent the evasion of a direct response. Logical argumentation is employed, linking the minister’s background in medical ethics to the theme of political responsibility.

The rhetorical style is resolute and confrontational, employing strong metaphors (e.g., "carrying water with a sieve," or "salami slicing tactics"). The tone is formal, yet it contains irony and sharp accusations levelled at the board regarding procedural unfairness, ironically asking who the "god in heaven" is that evaluates the obstruction.