By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The criticism is directed at the systemic situation and the prevailing mindset, which are characterized by "mental stagnation" and cross-cutting crises. Specific opponents or policies are not named; the critique is rather general and focused on the current state of affairs.

The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and the government, highlighting the rarity of taking political responsibility in Estonia's recent history. The criticism is procedural and forceful, demanding a clear definition of the limits of responsibility, but it is not personal.

The opposition's stance is directed against the coalition and the board, sharply criticizing procedural unfairness and the restriction of the opposition's rights. The criticism is also aimed at the government's financial policy (the income tax hike) and the misuse of state subsidies, citing the Otepää case as an example. He/She defends his/her actions against accusations that they constitute obstructionism.