By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The rhetorical style is serious, formal, and concerned, expressing skepticism regarding the adequacy of the studies, particularly concerning the responses provided by individuals originating from the Soviet and Russian cultural sphere. The arguments are presented logically, relying on legal principles and demanding concrete steps to improve the security situation.

The rhetorical style is critical and deeply concerned, underscoring the fragility of transatlantic relations and the inadequacy of Estonian foreign policy. Strong language is employed (e.g., "emasculation," "paralyzed"), along with references to well-known mottos ("Never again alone," the NATO motto) to highlight the gravity of the situation. Although presented in the form of a question, the content constitutes a sharp political statement that appeals both to logic and to the public's sense of security.

The style is twofold: in the first address, the tone is critical and concerned, employing strong expressions (e.g., "things have gone completely off the rails"). In the second address, the tone is rather procedural and focused on details, where the speaker admits their inexperience and takes responsibility for the mistakes. They balance emotional appeals (the necessity of defending justice) with logical and technical procedural questions.