By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The criticism is aimed at the handling of the security situation and the ineffective deterrence of border crossings, a task considered overwhelming for the state. Furthermore, skepticism is expressed regarding the mindset and honesty of people originating from certain cultural backgrounds, which may impede obtaining an adequate picture of their true intentions.

The opposition is aimed at the policy of the government or the responsible minister concerning the reduction of the foreign missions network. The criticism is political and focuses on the inadequacy of the decision given the current security backdrop, accusing the government of sending a perverse signal regarding the seriousness of transatlantic relations.

The main criticism is directed at the institutional activities and management of the Prosecutor's Office, which are considered inadequate and protective of injustice. The system is also criticized for allowing high-ranking state officials, such as the Prosecutor General and the Commander of the Defence Forces, to resign without completing their terms of office. The criticism is systemic and focuses on the ineffective functioning of state authorities.