By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The speaking style is extremely formal, polite, and concise, utilizing standard forms of address ("Dear colleagues"). The emphasis is on a direct and logical appeal to support the draft legislation, with no emotional or narrative elements present.

The style is formal (when addressing the Minister and the Chairman), but it contains sharp and memorable imagery, such as accusing the Reform Party of the "mopedization" of Estonia (Eesti "punnvõrristamises"). Both logical questions (concerning involvement and tax categories) and vivid historical parallels regarding rural life are employed. The tone is critical and worried, particularly concerning traffic safety and the livelihood of rural residents.

The style is predominantly formal and analytical, posing direct and repeated questions to the minister concerning control measures. In the third speech, the speaker employs an anecdote and personal experience (Strasbourg, early 2000s) to establish a connection with the audience and comment on the procedural aspect of the Riigikogu sessions.

The style is formal and analytical, relying on international parallels and the operations of security agencies to substantiate the arguments. The speaker raises questions demanding clarification regarding the work of the Constitutional Committee, while simultaneously employing light irony when referencing the "fresh social democrats." The overall tone is serious and calls for heightened awareness.

The rhetorical style is formal, yet sharp and critical, employing strong value judgments such as "ethical relativism" and "fateful decision." Both logical arguments (demographics, road safety) and emotional appeals (people dying on the highway) are used to emphasize the urgency of the issues. All presentations are framed as questions directed to the Prime Minister, demanding a specific position or recommendation.