By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The political position strongly centers on ethical responsibility, demanding that Eesti 200 return the "blood money" donation linked to Usmanov. Regarding legislation, emphasis is placed on managing the legal and security risks associated with the draft sanctions bill. The speaker supports a collective decision-making process so that Estonia is not the first country in Europe to act, thereby questioning the wisdom of swift and independent action.

The political stance centers on the proportionality of justice and the appearance of fairness. The speaker criticizes the legal system's inconsistent approach, citing the Slava Ukraini and Parvel Pruunsild cases as examples, emphasizing the violation of constitutional rights (privacy) in the latter instance. The position is strongly value-based, stressing the principles of the rule of law.

The political position heavily focuses on the equal treatment of state secret holders and tightening security checks for government members. The speaker sharply criticizes the Eastern transport scandal and claims that the coalition parties are connected to "Eastern money," which suggests an undemocratic regime. The primary emphasis is placed on equality before the law and ensuring national security, thereby questioning the legitimacy of the government. The stance is strongly oppositional and value-driven.

The political position is highly critical of the government's actions, highlighting a contradiction in its Russia policy: European unity is demanded when imposing sanctions, yet support is given to a smaller group's "boots on the ground" initiative. Domestically, emphasis is placed on the inadequacy of public transportation in rural areas and its negative impact on rural life. The criticism is directed at the government's inconsistencies and its disregard for the actual situation in the countryside.