By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The political position centers on questions of citizenship and the exercise of state authority. The speaker strongly backs the proposal that only Estonian citizens should be permitted to vote in local elections, viewing the current arrangement as diluting accountability and posing a risk to national stability. This stance is deeply value-based, stressing legal continuity and the principle of *jus sanguinis* (the right of blood). He criticizes the historical decisions made by the Constitutional Assembly, arguing that they are no longer justifiable given the complicated international situation we face today.

The political stance is one of strong opposition, accusing the ruling coalition of ignoring and showing contempt for the work of democratic institutions. Its core positions are value-based, demanding the exclusion of voting rights for non-citizens at both the local and national levels, and emphasizing the necessity of power being exercised by Estonian citizens. It sharply criticizes the functioning of local democracy and the flaws in the electoral system, viewing these issues as holding back Estonian democracy.

The political position focuses heavily on overseeing government activities and criticizing the personnel policies concerning high-ranking state officials. The speaker expresses doubt regarding the integrity of the State Secretary replacement and characterizes the movement of officials as political maneuvering. This stance is forcefully presented and highly critical of the government's staffing choices, emphasizing that "personnel decides everything."

The political position is highly critical of the accuracy of the security information presented by the government (or minister). The emphasis is placed on the government's performance and factual correctness, especially concerning the designation and status of NATO operations. This stance is aimed at scrutinizing the government's activities and exposing inaccuracies.