Agenda Profile: Ants Frosch
Inquiry concerning the justification of the activities of the Prosecutor's Office and the Security Police Board (KaPo) (No. 528)
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The most important issue is the proportionality of the administration of justice and the appearance of fairness, which is framed as both a value-based and a procedural question. The speaker expresses strong concern and criticism regarding how constitutional rights (the inviolability of private life) were brutally trampled upon in one case (Pruunsild), while similar measures were not applied in the second case (Slava Ukraini). This position emphasizes the need to ensure the uniform and fair application of justice.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the principles governing the administration of justice, particularly concerning proportionality and the appearance of justice. They are capable of comparing specific high-profile investigative cases (Pruunsild and Slava Ukraini) from the perspective of applying legal standards. Legal terminology is employed, including "application of the principle of proportionality" and "constitutionally protected rights."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and respectful when addressing the Minister and the Director, but the tone is concerned and critical. Strong emotional expressions are used (e.g., "the inviolability of private life was callously and brutally trampled upon") alongside logical argumentation based on legal principles. The objective is to highlight the problem regarding the appearance of injustice in the administration of justice.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data indicates participation in the Riigikogu session during an interpellation, addressing the minister directly. The pattern of activity focuses on oversight and posing questions regarding the government's actions. Information regarding the frequency of other appearances is unavailable.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism targets the actions of the investigative authorities (the Prosecutor’s Office and KaPo), specifically alleging the violation of constitutionally protected rights and the failure to observe the principle of proportionality. The criticism is intense, centering on procedural shortcomings and the tactical deployment of the judicial process.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national level, handling high-profile cases related to the activities of judicial and investigative bodies. There is no regional or international focus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue is the protection of civil liberties and constitutional rights during a state investigation, emphasizing the importance of privacy. The speaker strongly advocates for the defense of these rights, criticizing their cruel and callous violation in the interest of investigative tactics.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on parliamentary oversight and interpellation concerning the justification and legality of the activities of law enforcement agencies. The objective is to ensure that the executive branch adheres to constitutional principles. Direct legislative bills or proposed amendments are not mentioned.
1 Speeches Analyzed