By Years: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker’s style is highly confrontational and passionate, frequently employing emotional and moralizing language ("a stain on our reputation," "brutal outrage," "an outright lie," "totalitarian"). He balances legal and technical arguments with sharp accusations leveled directly at the government (e.g., attempted fraud, disrespect for the constitution). He favors rhetorical questions and hypothetical parallels (e.g., comparing Estonia’s actions to the methods of the Soviet Union or the mafia) to underscore the immorality and absurdity of his opponents' actions.

The style is predominantly confrontational, passionate, and sharp, especially when directed at the government and the prime minister. It frequently employs moral and ethical appeals (e.g., "shameful," "humiliating," "grotesque," "deceitful") and accuses opponents of ideological blindness. It favors logical arguments and legal facts but also utilizes emotional language, particularly when emphasizing social issues (abortion, child protection) and the lack of accountability. It criticizes opponents' responses as "fogging the issue" and "demagoguery.