Agenda Profile: Peeter Ernits
Draft law (583 SE) for the second reading on accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and approval of amendment to Article 20(1) of the Convention.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
While it supports joining the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (voting in favor), it views the discussion surrounding it as a waste of time and "busywork." The political focus is directed at criticizing the government's actions and the burdening of the populace, emphasizing the need to genuinely improve the lives of the Estonian people. The evaluation is strongly results-based and critical, particularly regarding Kaja Kallas's tenure in government.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates awareness of the convention's mechanisms (the possibility of filing complaints across borders) and inquires about its practical feasibility, demanding data regarding complaints received from other countries. To support their arguments, they use references to public opinion polls (public fatigue) and trade union data (purchasing food based on price).
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is initially inquisitive and pragmatic, but by the third address, it shifts to become critical and emotionally charged, conveying embarrassment and deep concern regarding the state of the nation. The speaker employs sharp language (the government hates the people, bluster) and contrasts Estonia's conduct (flailing, showing off) with Finland's quiet and sensible approach.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
It occurs repeatedly during the discussion, starting with specific questions regarding the content and practical impact of the draft bill and concluding with a broad political statement. He/She refers to his/her activity in parliament, monitoring the proceedings and noting the abundance of substitute activity.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the government's inaction and the draining of the public, as well as the defense minister's bluster regarding the war. Kaja Kallas's time in office is criticized particularly sharply ("completely insane"), while the potential reasonableness of Kristen Michal is acknowledged. The critique targets both the focus of the policy and the government's irresponsibility.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The individual acknowledges the appeals made by colleagues (Reili, Kalle) but casts doubt on their priorities, finding that the focus has shifted. Although they vote in favor of the draft bill, thereby demonstrating formal support, they are more broadly engaged in criticizing the overall activities of the parliament.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is heavily on the national level, centering on the lives of the Estonian people, the responsibility of the state, and the actions of the government. Internationally, the convention is addressed, and Finland’s conduct is brought in for comparison. There is no specific local or regional focus.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Expresses deep concern regarding the cost of living and poverty, highlighting that over half of all groceries are purchased based solely on price, which demonstrates the difficult economic situation of the nation. It criticizes the government for exploiting the populace and demands real improvements to life.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It supports the protection of women and their right to seek redress (emphasizing that no one should be left isolated), while simultaneously broadening the scope of social concern to encompass the general welfare of the population and the significant number of individuals neglected by the state. It also addresses the issue of male harassment, highlighting the necessity of protecting all people.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on the draft law (583 SE) concerning accession to the CEDAW Optional Protocol, despite being a 'yes' vote on the matter. The speaker raises questions regarding the practical impact and necessity of the bill but considers it a symbolic or displacement activity within the broader political context.
3 Speeches Analyzed