By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab

The speaker employs a polite yet firm tone, beginning with a formal salutation ("Thank you, esteemed Chair! Good Minister!"). Their style is fact-based and argumentative, utilizing specific figures and examples to bolster their position while maintaining a diplomatic approach.

It uses a factual and analytical approach, relying on specific figures and comparisons with neighboring countries. The rhetoric is moderately critical but constructive, emphasizing the need for solutions. It employs historical comparisons (the Luddite movement) and emotional appeals ("rural entrepreneurs are the heroes of our time").

The approach employed is diplomatic and constructive, starting with polite addresses. Questions are presented in a fact-based and balanced manner, acknowledging the importance of national defense while simultaneously raising critical questions regarding the source of funding.

The speaker adopts a factual and explanatory tone, beginning with a slightly ironic remark concerning the mandate. He structures his address logically, numbering the main points and utilizing clear examples. The style is more technocratic than emotional, although it also includes direct challenges to opposing viewpoints.

It employs a polite and constructive tone, addressing the audience as "Honorable Chairman" and "Esteemed Prime Minister." The style is fact-based and explanatory, including a personal anecdote ("as Toots usually agreed upon with the teacher") to soften the formal address.

A polite and constructive approach, starting with expressions of gratitude and using respectful language. Questions are posed to seek clarification, not to level accusations, focusing on determining the practical implications.

The speaker employs a polite and formal tone, using the salutations "Esteemed Chairman" and "Dear Minister." Questions are posed constructively, relying on facts (such as price increases and the functioning of systems), and seeking specific answers regarding future plans.

The approach used is explanatory and fact-based, honestly acknowledging the problems and challenges involved. The tone is pragmatic—it admits, concerning the rising electricity bills, that "yes, this is not very pleasant," but then justifies why it is necessary. It combines technical explanations with political positions, utilizing both logical argumentation and emotional appeal ("you have to understand!").

A polite and formal tone is used, addressing individuals via "esteemed chairman" and "dear minister." The question is presented in a structured manner, relying on facts and logical argumentation, and is devoid of emotional expression.

The speaker employs polite forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman," "Dear Minister") while simultaneously adopting a firm and critical tone toward the government's policy. He combines fact-based arguments with emotional assessments, using the phrase "the masks have fallen" and accusing the government of punishing consumers. The style is formal, yet clearly positioned.