By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab

Employs a balanced and analytical approach, combining both emotional and logical arguments. Provides concrete examples (Lithuania's 4% club) and utilizes rhetorical questions to clarify the situation. The style is direct and pragmatic, avoiding accusations ("I don't want to blame or point fingers either"), yet emphasizing the urgency of making decisions.

It employs rhetorical questions and irony ("it's nice to hear how the whole world is going to hell"), combining this with fact-based arguments. The style is direct and critical, but remains formal and argumentative, rather than being a personal attack.

Uses an official and fact-based approach, balancing logical arguments with concrete examples (such as the impact of solar energy on stock market prices). The tone is persuasive and optimistic, emphasizing practical benefits and future opportunities. The speech is clearly structured, beginning with general objectives and moving toward specific legislative amendments.

The speaker utilized an official and analytical tone, combining fact-based arguments with personal experience. They emphasized their two roles—as a faction representative and as the chairman of the Economic Affairs Committee. The style was constructive and focused on collaboration, including expressions of gratitude and recognition toward other parties. The presentation concluded by outlining concrete next steps.

Uses an official and respectful tone ("Esteemed Chairman," "Dear Riigikogu"), combining this with specific facts and personal assessment. The rhetoric is constructive and cooperative, avoiding sharp attacks. Speeches are concluded briefly and concretely, demonstrating effective communication.

The speaker employs a moderate yet firm tone, carefully balancing emotional and logical arguments. He/She repeatedly stresses the necessity of protecting both national security and the rights of the faithful. The style of address is formal and structured, utilizing clear reasoning and examples, including personal experience gained from participating in a Radio 4 broadcast.

Uses explanatory and persuasive rhetoric, repeatedly emphasizing the core message that the statement does not concern religious believers. It relies on facts and specific documents, maintaining an official tone. Questions are answered thoroughly and with patient explanation, using repetition to stress important points. The style is diplomatic, yet firm in its positions.