Management Decisions
Session: 15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Date: 2024-10-09 15:25
Participating Politicians:
Total Speeches: 10
Membership: 15
Agenda Duration: 12m
AI Summaries: 10/10 Speeches (100.0%)
Analysis: Structured Analysis
Politicians Speaking Time
Politicians
Analysis
Summary
The topic of the third question concerned the basis for management decisions and their transparency in energy policy, focusing on decisions made with the support of offshore wind farms. Urmas Reinsalu posed a thorough question, referencing a news article published in February, and asked what information and calculations those decisions were based on, and whether the source data is fully accessible to the public. Coalition partners Ossinovski and Kristina Kallas voiced criticism regarding both the substantive quality of the decision and the availability of calculation data, emphasizing that consistent figures are not visible. In response, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas confirmed that the data is publicly available and has been discussed in committees and parliamentary groups; an explanation was given regarding the calculation basis, including aspects related to consumption volume and the amount of state aid, as well as the roles of the European Commission and EISA/EIS.
Decisions Made 1
No final decisions were made within the scope of the third question; discussions continue at the level of committees and ministries, focusing on clarifying information requests and the public availability of computational data, as well as further improving budget transparency.
Most Active Speaker
The most active speaker was Urmas Reinsalu (a member of the Riigikogu, right-wing). He posed several clarifying questions and steered the discussion, making a forceful proposal that transparency and public access to source data are of critical importance.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The third question is addressed to Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by Urmas Reinsalu. The topic of the debate is leadership decisions.
Urmas Reinsalu
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Urmas Reinsalu is asking what data and calculations were used as the basis for the decision to develop four offshore wind farms, and whether that source data is available to the public, especially considering the criticism raised by Ossinovski and Kristina Kallas regarding the substantive quality of the decision.
Peaminister Kristen Michal
AI Summary
Prime Minister Kristen Michal confirms that the data is not mysterious and has been shared openly with committees, parliamentary groups, and businesses. Furthermore, the plan for the offshore wind farm, which has a capacity of approximately 1000 MW, is based on an estimated 2 TWh of Estonia’s domestic consumption. Decisions are also being considered, in cooperation between the state aid mechanism and the European Commission, that will bring savings and export opportunities to the national economy. The matter has only seemed mysterious to those who have not bothered to read past the initial report.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar thanked [the previous speaker] and invited Urmas Reinsalu to ask a clarifying question.
Urmas Reinsalu
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Urmas Reinsalu stated that the substantive quality of energy policy decisions is lacking. He demanded the public disclosure of Climate Ministry data before any decisions are finalized, and called upon the prime minister to appear before the special committee regarding the Nordica case and the role of the general assembly, requesting that the PM correct his attitude.
Peaminister Kristen Michal
AI Summary
Prime Minister Kristen Michal stressed that the energy calculations and relevant facts are public, and criticism should not be kept secret. Furthermore, Vladimir Svet is now responsible for the Nordica matter, and the commission has already met with him; the debate continues.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
Chairman Lauri Hussar thanked [the previous speaker] and called upon Aleksandr Tšaplõgin for the next supplementary question.
Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
He emphasizes the incomprehensibility and lack of transparency of the state budget and asks whether the budget will be clarified.
Peaminister Kristen Michal
AI Summary
Prime Minister Kristen Michal stated that the 2021 budget was difficult to read, and the situation has since improved. The 2025 budget is constitutional, but for the 2026 budget, the underlying law must be clarified so that the budget is more easily trackable. The coalition wants a greater overview of how state funds are used, and the Ministry of Finance and other agencies are developing open monitoring solutions. Furthermore, provisions in the law will be discussed and amended if necessary, should the Chancellor of Justice or the Ministry of Finance deem it requisite, without causing disagreement within the government.
Esimees Lauri Hussar
AI Summary
The Chairman thanks everyone and confirms that the dream of twelve answered questions persists, and we will continue vigorously and conclude the handling of the third question.