By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The language used is formal and analytical, taking the form of a parliamentary question and addressing the esteemed Mr. Chairman and Madam Minister. The tone is critical, yet measured, highlighting logical flaws and avoiding emotional appeals, although issues (such as the state of national sciences/humanities) are described acutely. The speaker stresses that they do not wish to be "preemptively negative," but they see clear shortcomings.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical, combative, and concerned, accusing the government of abandoning parliamentarism and allowing inclusion to turn into a "façade of democracy." The speaker uses both detailed technical data and strong emotional appeals, warning that Estonia should not be a laboratory and Estonians should not be test subjects. The speech is formal, repeatedly addressing "Estonian men, Estonian women" to emphasize the national interest.

The style is sharp, critical, and populist, combining economic-historical analysis with emotional appeals to stand up for the people. Specific numerical calculations are used (e.g., 57,000 euros per child), and reference is made to the nationalists' protest slogan, "Sigtuna is not far away anymore!"—emphasizing opposition to foreign influence and the government.